which would YOU prefer?

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (myxtplkn) — Mon, 05 May 2008 06:43:20 GMT

We just play for fun and nobody keep score.

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (KEVH8SBAMA) — Sun, 04 May 2008 20:30:08 GMT

WarTeddy wrote:
I read where one of the reasons the BCS declined going to a plus one was because they didn't want football being a two semester sport. Duh!!! Drop one game off the schedules and don't give teams a month off before the bowls start. Play the bowl games and the four team playoff in December and play the title game on Jan 1st or 2nd. Done deal!! Easier said than done I am sure . lol

yet...

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (imatiger) — Sat, 03 May 2008 14:28:44 GMT

my official poll rules dictate that votes for #4 and #5 will automatically default to a vote for #3

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (WarTeddy) — Sat, 03 May 2008 13:02:38 GMT

Talking about them not wanting two SEC teams playing for the title. They sure in the heck were lobbying for a rematch of Michigan and Ohio State playing for the title. And the Big 10 Commissioner had no problem with that. I still think it's funny a 2 loss SEC team ran Ohio State off the field for the second straight year!!! Goooo SEC!!!!!!!

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (iloveshug) — Sat, 03 May 2008 12:38:24 GMT

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (Tiger on Wheels) — Fri, 02 May 2008 09:07:35 GMT

Let the AP poll have more pull in the voting.

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (bamasux) — Fri, 02 May 2008 08:25:25 GMT

Nothing is going to change until at least the year 2014. The only two conferences pushing for the plus one concept were the ACC and of course the SEC. The BCS stated that the current system in place is the best for now. The SEC commisioner was pi$$ed off because no other conference would back any kind of playoff plan. The real reason I think they don't want it is because if you take the top 4 teams where 1 plays 3 and 2 plays 4, the winners might end up being from the same conference. (...

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (hornyleprechaun) — Fri, 02 May 2008 07:23:36 GMT

mabwriter wrote:
8 team playoff. You take the 6 bcs conference champions and top 2 non-bcs conference champions/Notre Dame. And the Irish would go for it because they would not have to be 12th to get in. And you would not have to do seeding. The bowls would still have tie ins so the Rose would be happy. Then you take the 4 bcs bowl winners and do a four team playoff.

Exactly what I was going to say. IMO it is...

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (mabwriter) — Fri, 02 May 2008 07:19:28 GMT

8 team playoff. You take the 6 bcs conference champions and top 2 non-bcs conference champions/Notre Dame. And the Irish would go for it because they would not have to be 12th to get in. And you would not have to do seeding. The bowls would still have tie ins so the Rose would be happy. Then you take the 4 bcs bowl winners and do a four team playoff.

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (WarTeddy) — Fri, 02 May 2008 06:17:21 GMT

I read where one of the reasons the BCS declined going to a plus one was because they didn't want football being a two semester sport. Duh!!! Drop one game off the schedules and don't give teams a month off before the bowls start. Play the bowl games and the four team playoff in December and play the title game on Jan 1st or 2nd. Done deal!! Easier said than done I am sure . lol

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (wcvet) — Fri, 02 May 2008 04:27:38 GMT

A playoff could be worked out and would make more money and benefit all BUT the BCS conferences would have to relinquish some power , money, control and prestige in their PERCEPTION. I acutally think the money would be greater in a playoff but it would be spread out more as well and also some bowl realignment would have to happen. IT will never happen as the BCS and the Rose Bowl contract dates run differently so there is a built in excuse to not do it as you would have to break the contract...

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (Vanlarri) — Fri, 02 May 2008 03:33:03 GMT

Re: which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (theplainstruth) — Fri, 02 May 2008 01:05:43 GMT

Without a playoff, there never has been, and never will be, a CHAMPION. Unless there is only 1 undefeated team in the nation. Hearing teams with one loss, or two, claim to be champions is moronic. A champion either wins all of it's games, or wins a playoff, to me there is no other way, it's just a beauty pageant.

which would YOU prefer?

feeds@yuku.com (imatiger) — Thu, 01 May 2008 19:28:03 GMT

(This just popped into my head after seeing a headline on al.com.)

#1..........the current BCS system as is

#2..........NO national champion....only conference champions and the bowl games are just for entertainment and interesting matchups. Polls and
rankings not allowed.

#3..........that this thought should've just stayed in my head